Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Seikbert v. Wilkinson

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 1994No. 1992-1231PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 69 Ohio St.3d 489.] THE STATE EX REL. SEIKBERT, APPELLANT, v. WILKINSON, DIRECTOR, ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as State ex rel. Seikbert v. Wilkinson,

1994-Ohio-39.] Mandamus to compel release on parole after minimum term of incarceration had expired—Complaint dismissed, when. (No. 92-1231—Submitted April 5, 1994—Decided June 22, 1994.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 91AP-1181. __________________ {¶ 1} Ronald W. Seikbert, relator-appellant, filed a complaint in the Franklin County Court of Appeals on October…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Bordenkircher v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. O'Brien v. University Community Tenants Union, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Mabry v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. State ex rel. Seikbert v. WilkinsonOhio Supreme Court · 1994

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. StreicherOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. State ex rel. Cobb v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2017
  3. Hernandez v. RiggleOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
  4. State ex rel. Bailey v. Ohio Parole Bd.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2016
  5. State ex rel. Dodson v. PhippsOhio Supreme Court · 2024

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API