Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Dodson v. Phipps

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 2024No. 2023-1418PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 176 Ohio St.3d 734.] THE STATE EX REL . DODSON, APPELLANT, v. PHIPPS, JUDGE, ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as State ex rel. Dodson v. Phipps,

2024-Ohio-4928.] Procedendo—Mandamus—Inmate pursued adequate remedy in ordinary course of law by appealing judge’s denial of his motions to journalize jury-verdict forms—Inmate failed to establish that Adult Parole Authority has a clear legal duty not to use Ohio Risk Assessment System tool at a new parole hearing—When construed most strongly in inmate’s favor, the evidence does not support his…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. State v. IshmailOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  3. State ex rel. Waters v. SpaethOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  4. State v. WallsOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State ex rel. Keith v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Martin v. McCormickOhio Supreme Court · 2026
  2. State ex rel. Bey v. McGookeyOhio Court of Appeals · 2026
  3. Beckman v. Ohio Parole Bd.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2024
  4. State ex rel. Smith v. VodreyOhio Court of Appeals · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API