Legal Opinion · Dissent

Castro v. Goemaere

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided April 30, 1974No. Docket 16547Published

1DissentDanhof, P. J.

The facts and procedural posture of this case are such that we need not decide whether the Secretary can, in an appropriate proceeding, obtain a judicial order of setoff. Furthermore, the propriety of the Secretary’s ad-, ministrative setoff has not been properly challenged by plaintiff.

Plaintiff’s appeal is before us on the denial of his motion to set aside a consent judgment. The trial court’s comment from the bench, that it saw "nothing wrong with the action of the Secretary of State”, made at the conclusion of the hearing, was not a judicial determination that the statute permitted the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Russell v. WhiteMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Brunner v. Secretary of StateMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
  3. Franklin Co. v. Buhl Land Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Blaske v. BlaskeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API