Russell v. White
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Branch. (Pealer, J.) Bill filed to dissolve a partnership, etc. Defendants appeal. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtOhamplin, J.
The bill in this case was filed by Benton T. Russell for the purpose of dissolving a partnership and winding' up its affairs.
The bill alleged that on and previous to January 10,1884, the defendants were copartners, doing business in the city of Coldwater in the grocery and provision business, and on that day complainant purchased from John B. Wells his interest in the assets of the firm, with .the consent of his copartner, White, and entered into a copartnership with White in said business under the firm name of George M. White & Go.; that they continued in business as such copartners until…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Prawdzik v. Heidema Brothers, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1958
- Newton v. Security National BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
- Fishman v. AlbertsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
- Tudryck v. MutchMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
- Horning v. Saginaw Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.