Legal Opinion

Zehner v. Aultman

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1881No. 7724PublishedCited by 6 opinions

From the Marshall Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtWoods, J.

Suit upon a promissory note and chattel mortgage. Issues of fact; verdict, judgment and decree of foreclosure in favor of the appellees. The appellant Zehner was not a party to the note or mortgage,- but was charged as a purchaser in possession of a part of the moi'tgaged property, which, besides a reaper and mower, was described in the mortgage as consisting of “one-third of twenty-two acres of growing wheat, situate,” etc.

Zehner alone has assigned error, and that upon the overruling of his motion for a new trial. Under this assignment he claims that the verdict against him is contrary to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McDaniel v. MattinglyIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Elbert v. HobyIndiana Supreme Court · 1880

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. O'Donald v. ConstantIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Muncie National Bank v. BrownIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Riddle v. DowSupreme Court of Iowa · 1896
  4. Saint Joseph Hydraulic Co. v. WilsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Johnson v. RiderSupreme Court of Iowa · 1891

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API