Zehner v. Aultman
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Marshall Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtWoods, J.
Suit upon a promissory note and chattel mortgage. Issues of fact; verdict, judgment and decree of foreclosure in favor of the appellees. The appellant Zehner was not a party to the note or mortgage,- but was charged as a purchaser in possession of a part of the moi'tgaged property, which, besides a reaper and mower, was described in the mortgage as consisting of “one-third of twenty-two acres of growing wheat, situate,” etc.
Zehner alone has assigned error, and that upon the overruling of his motion for a new trial. Under this assignment he claims that the verdict against him is contrary to…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- McDaniel v. MattinglyIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
- Elbert v. HobyIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
3Cited by6 opinions
- O'Donald v. ConstantIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
- Muncie National Bank v. BrownIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Riddle v. DowSupreme Court of Iowa · 1896
- Saint Joseph Hydraulic Co. v. WilsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
- Johnson v. RiderSupreme Court of Iowa · 1891
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.