Legal Opinion
James A. Kay, Jr. v. Federal Communications Commission
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided February 1, 2005No. 02-1175, 04-1045PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge RANDOLPH.
RANDOLPH, Circuit Judge.
These are consolidated appeals from orders of the Federal Communications Commission sanctioning James A. Kay, Jr., and Marc D. Sobel for intentionally trying to mislead the Commission, and for engaging in an unauthorized transfer of control of Sobel’s land mobile service facilities. Káy and Sobel argue that the administrative record does not contain substantial evidence to support the orders.
I
Since the early 1980’s Kay has provided two-way radio mobile service in the Los Angeles area through a sole proprietorship —…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- National Labor Relations Board v. Columbian Enameling & Stamping Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Allentown MacK Sales & Service, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Illinois Central Railroad v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Federal Communications Commission v. Allentown Broadcasting Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Feinerman v. BernardiDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Wamai v. Republic of SudanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Raymond J. Lucia Companies, Inc. v. Securities & Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
- In Re South Canaan Cellular Investments, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
- Marshall v. Civil Service CommissionColorado Court of Appeals · 2016
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.