Tennessee Chemical Co. v. Harper
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtBloodworth, J.
(After stating the foregoing facts.)
The 1st headnote requires no elaboration.
Whether or not the appearance in court of R. II. Harper by his attorney, and the urging by said attorney of an oral general demurrer to the petition, would be a waiver of service need not be determined,, as the record shows that the sheriff made a return in which he stated that he had served the defendant R. H. Harper by leaving a copy of the writ and process “ at his most notorious place.” This return was incomplete, in that the words “ of abode,” which should have followed the words “ most notorious place,” were…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Jones v. Bibb Brick Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Bell v. New Orleans & Northeastern RailroadCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
- Georgia Railway & Power Co. v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1914
- Akers v. High Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Colquitt v. Mercer & DeGraffenreidSupreme Court of Georgia · 1871
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Harper v. Tennessee Chemical Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1927
- Ryder Automobile Leasing Co. v. TatesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
- Busey v. MilamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957