Busey v. Milam
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtGardner, P. J.
1. The defendant contends that the trayerse of entry of service is legally sufficient to raise the issue of whether or not there has been a legal return of service as required by law. The plaintiff contends that it is not legally sufficient. The defendant calls attention to Parker v. Rosenheim & Co., 97 Ga. 769 (25 S. E. 763). In that case the traverse to the entry of service was entirely different from the alleged traverse of the entry of service in the instant case. In that case the facts show the following: “The traverse to the sheriff’s return of service contained all the essential…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Jones v. Bibb Brick Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Dozier v. LambSupreme Court of Georgia · 1877
- Cochran v. WhitworthCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
- Carroll v. MullerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
- Southern Express Co. v. National BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Focus Healthcare Medical Center, Inc. v. O’nealCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
- Milam v. BuseyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957