Lase Co. v. Wein Products, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
BAUER, District Judge.
This cause comes on the defendants’ motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12 (b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
This is a diversity action for trade ■ libel, slander of title and unfair competition and trade practices under Illinois law combined with an action for false marking under 35 U.S.C. § 292. The plaintiff, the Lase Co., is incorporated under the laws of the State of Illinois and has its principal place of business in that state.
Defendant, Wein Products, Inc., is incorporated under the laws of the State of California, and has its…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Canton Union Coal Co. v. Parlin & Orendorff Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1905
- Horace B. Brose v. Sears, Roebuck and CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
- Calderwood v. MansfieldDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1947
- Scott Paper Company v. Fort Howard Paper CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1972
- Canton Union Coal Co. v. Parlin & Orendorff Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1905
3Cited by6 opinions
- Henry V. Vaccaro Construction Co. v. A. J. DePace, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
- Accent Designs, Inc. v. Jan Jewelry Designs, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- Kalkowski v. Ronco, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1976
- Idaho Norland Corp. v. Caelter Industries, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1981
- Selby v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.