Doe v. Bausch & Lomb Incorporated
District Court, D. Connecticut
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT DOE, et al, ) 3:18-CV-000352 (KAD) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) BAUSCH & LOMB, INC., et al, ) Defendants. ) March 11, 2020 MEMORANDUM OF DECISION ON THE DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS (ECF NO. 95) AND PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND THE COMPLAINT (ECF NO. 126) Kari A. Dooley, United States District Judge: This is a products liability action involving the Trulign Toric intraocular lens (“Trulign Lens” or “Trulign Lenses”). The Trulign Lenses, manufactured by Defendant Bausch & Lomb, Incorporated (“B&L”) for the treatment of cataracts, are…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.