Legal Opinion

Doe v. Bausch & Lomb Incorporated

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided March 11, 2020No. 3:18-cv-00352Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT DOE, et al, ) 3:18-CV-000352 (KAD) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) BAUSCH & LOMB, INC., et al, ) Defendants. ) March 11, 2020 MEMORANDUM OF DECISION ON THE DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS (ECF NO. 95) AND PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND THE COMPLAINT (ECF NO. 126) Kari A. Dooley, United States District Judge: This is a products liability action involving the Trulign Toric intraocular lens (“Trulign Lens” or “Trulign Lenses”). The Trulign Lenses, manufactured by Defendant Bausch & Lomb, Incorporated (“B&L”) for the treatment of cataracts, are…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API