Legal Opinion

Rey Sanchez Investments v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 26, 2016No. E063757Published

1Opinion of the Court

Filed 1/6/16; pub. order 1/26/16 (see end of opn.) IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO REY SANCHEZ INVESTMENTS, Petitioner, E063757 v. (Super.Ct.No. CIVDS1403591) THE SUPERIOR COURT OF OPINION SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, Respondent; PCH ENTERPRISES, INC., Real Party in Interest. ORIGINAL PROCEEDINGS; petition for writ of mandate. Bryan Foster, Judge. Petition granted. Law Offices of Mary Jean Pedneau, Mary Jean Pedneau and William R. Larr for Petitioner. No appearance for Respondent. No appearance for Real Party in Interest. 1 After reviewing…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Palma v. U.S. Industrial Fasteners, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Rialto Citizens for Responsible Growth v. City of RialtoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  3. People v. PerezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  4. McKnight v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  5. Chino Commercial Bank, N.A. v. PetersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API