Legal Opinion

Chino Commercial Bank, N.A. v. Peters

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 13, 2010No. E049170PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RICHLI, J.

Appellant Brian D. Peters is the victim of a Nigerian-style e-mail scam. He agreed that his corporation would receive money supposedly owed to a gentleman in Malaysia, and would then pay that money out at the gentleman’s direction, in return for a 15 percent fee. His corporation received checks totaling $808,988.90 and deposited them in an account with respondent Chino Commercial Bank, N.A. (the Bank). It then had the Bank make wire transfers totaling $468,000 out of the account. All of the checks bounced, because they had been altered. This resulted in an overdraft. The Bank…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Deparment of Corporations. v. Speedee Oil Change Systems, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Crocker National Bank v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Glassell Development Co. v. Citizens' Natlional Bank of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Basch v. Bank of Am. Nat'l Tr. & Sav. Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Zengen, Inc. v. Comerica BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. FSI, Financial Solutions, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2011
  2. Carr v. RosienCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  3. Lombino v. Bank of America, N.A.District Court, D. Nevada · 2011
  4. BPi Bright Power, Inc. v. Umpqua Holding Corporation d/b/a Umpqua BankDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2023
  5. Grand Bayman Belize, Ltd. v. Wells Fargo and CompanyDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2021

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API