Legal Opinion

Hyde v. Shank

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 8, 1889PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Osceola. (Judkins, J.) Replevin. Plaintiffs bring error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, J.

Alonzo M. Shank, as sheriff of Osceola county, seized certain chattels by virtue of a writ of attachment sued out of the circuit court of that county in favor of Daniel M. Gardner, against the goods, chattels, lands, and tenements of John R. Edgett. The writ was tested on February 4, 1887, and was seiwed on the 11th of that month.

On November 3, 1886, John R. Edgett executed a mortgage to Frank D. and George S. Hyde, under the name of “Hyde Bros.;” which was duly filed on November 6, 1886. The mortgage recited that Edgett was justly indebted to Hyde Bros, in the sum of $2,000, and that he…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ganong v. GreenMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  2. George W. Roby Lumber Co. v. GrayMichigan Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Pettersch v. Grand Rapids Gas Light Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Pierson v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Pinconning State Bank v. HenryMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Simons v. HaberkornMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Hyde v. ShankMichigan Supreme Court · 1892

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API