Legal Opinion

Simons v. Haberkorn

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 1905No. Docket No. 31PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Wayne; Donovan, J. Assumpsit by George M. Simons, by next friend, against James H. A. Haberkorn for work and labor done. There was judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, C. J.

Plaintiff, a minor, and one Decker were in business in Detroit under the name of the Peninsular Wire Works. They made a contract with the defendant for the construction, for $130, of a wire screen around a ■two-story porch on a residence in Detroit, the screen to be made of large panels of wire mesh in channel iron frames overlaid with wire cloth, to be of materials specified in a written proposition. They proceeded with the work. Defendant and the supervising architect were dissatisfied with it, claiming the workmanship was faulty, and was ineffective to keep out mosquitoes and other…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Crippen v. HopeMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Hyde v. ShankMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  3. George W. Roby Lumber Co. v. GrayMichigan Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Newton v. Consolidated Construction Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Jageriskey v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  3. In Re Morweld Steel Products Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API