Legal Opinion

Glickman, Inc. v. Home Insurance Co

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided June 17, 1996No. 95-3221PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEPHEN H. ANDERSON, Circuit Judge.

Glickman, Inc. appeals from a denial of attorney’s fees under Kan. Stat. Ann. § 40-256, in this insurance coverage diversity ease. This appeal calls upon us to interpret § 256. That statute punishes insurance companies that refuse, without just cause or excuse, to pay the full amount of an insured loss, by requiring them to pay the plaintiff’s attorney’s fees incurred in a coverage action against the insurer. As pertinent, § 256 provides:

Attorney fees in actions on insurance policies; exception. That, in all actions hereafter commenced, in which judgment is…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Upland Mutual Insurance, Inc. v. NoelSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
  2. Spruill Motors, Inc. v. Universal Underwriters InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  3. Forrester Ex Rel. Forrester v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  4. American Motorists Insurance Company v. General Host Corporation & American Salt Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  5. Brown v. Combined Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1979

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Magnus, Inc. v. Diamond State Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
  2. Moses v. HalsteadCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
  3. United Wats, Inc. v. Cincinnati InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1997
  4. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. Hartford Casualty InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2002
  5. Donna Davis v. Prudential Property and Casualty Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API