Hayes v. Peters
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
STEELMAN, Judge.
Plaintiff's complaint did not sufficiently state a claim for medical malpractice under the common law doctrine of res ipsa loquitur, thus the trial court properly dismissed it pursuant to N.C. Gen.Stat. § 1A-1, Rule 12(b)(6).
In January of 2004, Ivan Hayes ("plaintiff") reported difficulty swallowing to his primary care physician. Plaintiff was referred to Dr. Randy Alan Peters ("Dr. Peters"), a specialist in Gastroenterology. On 23 January 2004, plaintiff was placed under general anesthesia for an esophagastroduodenoscopy ("procedure") ordered by Dr. Peters. About twenty…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Sutton v. DukeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- Stanback v. StanbackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- Anderson v. AssimosSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
- State v. Fayetteville Street Christian SchoolSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Lea v. GrierCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Wake County v. Hotels.com, L.P.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
- Robinson v. Duke University Health Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
- Wood v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2016
- Bluitt v. Wake Forest Univ. Baptist Med. Ctr.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
- Allman v. Swain Cnty. Bd. of ElectionsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2025
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.