Legal Opinion

Hayes v. Peters

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 19, 2007No. COA06-1157PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEELMAN, Judge.

Plaintiff's complaint did not sufficiently state a claim for medical malpractice under the common law doctrine of res ipsa loquitur, thus the trial court properly dismissed it pursuant to N.C. Gen.Stat. § 1A-1, Rule 12(b)(6).

In January of 2004, Ivan Hayes ("plaintiff") reported difficulty swallowing to his primary care physician. Plaintiff was referred to Dr. Randy Alan Peters ("Dr. Peters"), a specialist in Gastroenterology. On 23 January 2004, plaintiff was placed under general anesthesia for an esophagastroduodenoscopy ("procedure") ordered by Dr. Peters. About twenty…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Sutton v. DukeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  2. Stanback v. StanbackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  3. Anderson v. AssimosSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
  4. State v. Fayetteville Street Christian SchoolSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  5. Lea v. GrierCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Wake County v. Hotels.com, L.P.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
  2. Robinson v. Duke University Health Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  3. Wood v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2016
  4. Bluitt v. Wake Forest Univ. Baptist Med. Ctr.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
  5. Allman v. Swain Cnty. Bd. of ElectionsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2025

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API