Legal Opinion
Marshall v. Foote
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 27, 1927No. Docket No. 5327PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKnight, J.
The plaintiff herein was employed as a nurse in a hospital owned and operated by the defendant and during the course of such employment was injured as a result of falling down a flight of stairs into the basement in one of the hospital buildings. At the time of the accident defendant had not complied with the requirements of the Workmen’s Compensation Act with respect to securing payment of compensation to injured employees, and consequently plaintiff, availing herself of the provisions of section 29 (b) of said act, brought this action for damages and recovered a judgment for $1,090, plus…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fé Railway Co. v. EllisSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fé Railroad v. MatthewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- City of Pasadena v. StimsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Western Indemnity Co. v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- E. Clemens Horst Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Rideaux v. TorgrimsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Hawthorn v. City of Beverly HillsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Chakmakjian v. LoweCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Peters v. California Building-Loan Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1931
- Goodman Bros. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.