Legal Opinion

Oliver v. Ernul

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 5, 1970No. 703DC377PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBritt, J.

Did the trial court err in granting defendants’ motion for judgment as of involuntary nonsuit (this action being tried prior to 1 January 1970) ? Considering the evidence and the admissions in the pleadings in the light most favorable to plaintiffs, we hold that it did.

We hold that plaintiffs’ exhibit No. 1, although poorly drafted, if proven over defendants’ denial is sufficient as a deed creating a twenty-foot easement extending from U. S. Highway No. 70 to the A. & E. C. Railroad and adjacent to the eastern line of the land originally owned by Ernul. In Hine v. Blumenthal, 239 N.C. 537, 80…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lee v. WalkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  2. Hine v. BlumenthalSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  3. Russell v. CogginSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  4. Green v. BarbeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  5. Wright v. Town of Lake WaccamawSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Broyhill v. CoppageCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  2. Oliver v. ErnulSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  3. Oliver v. ErnulSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API