Russell v. Coggin
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtDeNNT, J.
It is now well settled the dedication of a street may not be withdrawn, if the dedication has been accepted and the street or any part of it is actually opened and used by the public. Insurance Co. v. Carolina Beach, 216 N.C. 778, 7 S.E. 2d 13; Broocks v. Muirhead, 223 N.C. 227, 25 S.E. 2d 889. Moreover, “where lots are sold and conveyed by reference to a map or plat which represent a division of a tract of land into subdivisions or streets and lots, such streets become dedicated to the public use, and the purchaser of a lot or lots acquires the right to have all and each of the streets kept…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Insurance Co. v. . Carolina BeachSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Hughes v. Clark.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
- Robinson v. Goldsboro.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
- Elizabeth City v. . CommanderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
- Irwin v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Food Town Stores, Inc. v. City of SalisburySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Wofford v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- Lee v. WalkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Hine v. BlumenthalSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Janicki v. LorekSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.