Legal Opinion

Oliver v. Ernul

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 20, 1971No. 61Published

1Opinion of the Court

178 S.E.2d 393 (1971)

277 N.C. 591

Garfield OLIVER and Richard A. Sutton

v.

Fred ERNUL, Luzzie Ernul and Grace Stamps.

No. 61.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 20, 1971.

Thomas S. Bennett, Morehead City, for defendant appellants.

Boshamer & Graham, Morehead City, for plaintiff appellees.

HUSKINS, Justice:

Does Plaintiffs' Exhibit 1, the "rightaway deed", expressly grant to plaintiffs a twenty-foot right-of-way over the lands of defendant Fred Ernul? If not, are plaintiffs entitled to a way of necessity over said lands? Answers to these questions are determinative of this controversy.

Even if its…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. President of Cincinnati v. Lessee of WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
  2. Labounty v. VickersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1967
  3. North Carolina Self Help Corp. v. BrinkleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  4. Lane v. CoeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  5. Conrad v. West End Hotel & Land Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1900

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API