Legal Opinion

United States v. Nason

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided October 19, 2001No. 01-1440PublishedCited by 96 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SELYA, Circuit Judge.

This appeal requires us to resolve an interpretive schism that has divided the district courts. This schism involves the interplay between a state assault statute and a federal law barring misdemeanants who have committed crimes of domestic violence from possessing firearms. The crux of the controversy is whether “offensive physical contact,” one of the two variants of assault featured in Maine’s general-purpose assault statute, necessarily involves the use or attempted use of physical force. If so, prior convictions under that statute can qualify as predicate offenses…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  4. Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Duncan v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by96 opinions

  1. United States v. CastlemanSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  2. Jamo v. Katahdin Federal Credit UnionCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
  3. Jose Ernesto Flores v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
  4. United States v. BookerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
  5. Plumley v. Southern Container, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002

91 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API