Legal Opinion

Jose Ernesto Flores v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided November 26, 2003No. 02-3160PublishedCited by 133 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge.

Jose Ernesto Flores was ordered removed under § 237(a)(2)(E) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2)(E), because he committed a “crime of domestic violence” — which means any offense that is a “crime of violence” under 18 U.S.C. § 16 and has a spouse or other domestic partner as a victim. The crime need not be defined in state law as “domestic”; all aspects of the definition are federal. But classification of a state crime under a federal definition can be tricky, and Flores denies that his offense qualifies. We have jurisdiction to determine…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. United States v. CaceresSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Adams Fruit Co. v. BarrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Calcano-Martinez v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 2001

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by133 opinions

  1. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  2. United States v. CastlemanSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  3. Stokeling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  4. Naji Antoine Tokatly v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  5. United States v. Rene Jaimes-JaimesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005

128 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API