Jose Ernesto Flores v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge.
Jose Ernesto Flores was ordered removed under § 237(a)(2)(E) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2)(E), because he committed a “crime of domestic violence” — which means any offense that is a “crime of violence” under 18 U.S.C. § 16 and has a spouse or other domestic partner as a victim. The crime need not be defined in state law as “domestic”; all aspects of the definition are federal. But classification of a state crime under a federal definition can be tricky, and Flores denies that his offense qualifies. We have jurisdiction to determine…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- United States v. CaceresSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Adams Fruit Co. v. BarrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Calcano-Martinez v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by133 opinions
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- United States v. CastlemanSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Stokeling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
- Naji Antoine Tokatly v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Rene Jaimes-JaimesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
128 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.