Legal Opinion

Van Tuyl v. . Schwab

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 13, 1917PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court m the first judicial department, entered November 3, 1916, which affirmed an order of Special Term granting defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings and directing a dismissal of the complaint.

Read the full summary

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court m the first judicial department, entered November 3, 1916, which affirmed an order of Special Term granting defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings and directing a dismissal of the complaint. This action was brought by the plaintiff, as superintendent of banks of the state of New York, against the stockholders of the Carnegie Trust Company to enforce their liability under section 196 of the Banking Law as it existed on January Y, 1911, pursuant to section 19 of that statute, which vested in the superintendent of…

1Opinion of the Court

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Hisgock, Oh. J., Chase, Cuddeback, Hogan, Pound, McLaughlin and Andrews, JJ.

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Cunningham v. Commissioner of BanksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
  2. Broderick v. AdamsonNew York Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Broderick v. McGuireSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
  4. Broderick v. AaronNew York Supreme Court · 1934
  5. White v. IdsardiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API