Legal Opinion

Eyman v. McPherson

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided September 22, 1965No. 2CA-CR 29PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KRUCKER, Chief Judge.

Appellant, Jack P. McPherson, filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in the Superior Court of Pinal County. The writ was quashed without formal hearing and applicant-appellant herein appeals to this Court.

Appellant had entered pleas of guilty to lewd and lascivious acts, three counts, in the Superior Court of Maricopa County, and was sentenced to serve not less than two nor more than three years on each count, sentences to run consecutively.

Three questions are raised in this appeal:

First, can the Superior Court legally impose consecutive sentences.

Second, must the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. VoeckellArizona Supreme Court · 1949
  2. State Ex Rel. Jones v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Beaty v. ShuteArizona Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Columbia Investment Co. v. M. M. Sundt Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
  5. State ex rel. Patterson v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. OwenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
  2. State v. KingCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
  3. Landers v. State Ex Rel. EymanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
  4. State v. SandersCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API