Legal Opinion

Landers v. State Ex Rel. Eyman

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided February 27, 1968No. 2 CA-CIV 495PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HATHAWAY, Chief Judge.

The appellant filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in superior court, Pinal County and has taken this appeal from the summary denial thereof. He contends that the superior court did not give proper consideration to his petition which “showed that his constitutional rights were violated” and that his conviction was “illegal.”

Needless to say, petitioner was not entitled to a writ of habeas corpus merely for the asking. Eyman v. McPherson, 1 Ariz.App. 578, 405 P.2d 830 (1965). Nor is a hearing required before denial of a habeas corpus application if the applicant,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Charles Blair v. The People of the State of California, Robert A. Heinze, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
  2. Edward Barker v. The State of OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1964
  3. Curtis v. BennettSupreme Court of Iowa · 1964
  4. State v. WhiteArizona Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Palmer v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1965

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Witt v. State Ex Rel. EymanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
  2. Atkins v. State ex rel. EymanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
  3. Howard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
  4. State v. McGinnesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
  5. White v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API