Legal Opinion

Schroeder v. Schweizer Lloyd Transport Versicherungs Gesellschaft

California Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 1882No. 6,844PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from a judgment for the plaintiffs and from an order denying a new trial.

1Opinion of the Court

Ross, J.:

The opinion delivered by Department Two in this case is here approved and adopted, but we think that instead of directing judgment to be entered for the defendant on the findings, the cause should be remanded for a new trial.

The power so to do is expressly conferred on the Court by Section 53 of the Code of Civil Procedure, which declares: “The Supreme Court may affirm, reverse or modify any judgment or order appealed from, and may direct the proper judgment or order to be entered, or direct a new trial or further proceedings to be had.” * * * (See also Argenti v. The City and County…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Carleton v. . DarcyNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  2. Argenti v. City of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Pollitz v. WickershamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Burtis v. Universal Pictures Co., Inc.California Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Loos v. Mountain Fuel Supply Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Carlson v. MurphyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  5. Le Saulnier v. KruegerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1893

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API