Legal Opinion
State v. Bell
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided February 8, 1977No. 2610PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOOD, Chief Judge.
The appeal involves two receiving stolen property convictions. One conviction was for receiving stolen property valued over $100.00 but not more than $2,500.00. The other conviction was for receiving a firearm valued less than $2,500.00. Section 40A-16-11, N.M.S.A.1953 (2d Repl. Vol. 6, Supp. 1975), Paragraphs E and G. The issues concern: (1) seizure of the stolen items, (2) the number of offenses, and (3) double jeopardy.
Seizure of Stolen Items(a) The Pistol
The conviction for receiving a stolen firearm is based upon a pistol which officers discovered when searching a…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Andresen v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- State v. TantonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1975
- State v. CarltonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1971
- State v. SelfNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1975
- State v. ThurmanNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1972
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. DobbsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1983
- State v. CervantesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1979
- Sanchez v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1982
- Sanchez v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1982
- Horsey v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.