Legal Opinion
Geary v. H. P. Hood & Sons, Inc.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided November 6, 1957PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWhittemore, J.
This is an action of tort, tried to a jury, to recover for the loss of sight in the right eye of the minor plaintiff and for the father’s consequent loss and expense. The judge in the Superior Court directed a verdict for the defendant on all the counts of the declaration. There was no error.
Taken most favorably for the plaintiffs the evidence shows facts as follows: At some time in the morning of April 24, 1950, the defendant’s employee made his daily delivery of a case of milk to the Bradstreet Primary Grade School building in Gloucester by depositing it in the front vestibule with five or…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Caissie v. City of CambridgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
- Glassey v. Worcester Consolidated Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
- Gaw v. Hew Construction Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
- Goldberger v. David Roberts Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
- Ryder v. RobinsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1952
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Metropolitan Coal Company, Inc. v. Franklin Johnson, New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad Company v. Franklin JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1959
- Patricia Venezia, Individually, and as She is Next Friend of Louis Venezia, a Minor v. Miller Brewing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
- Killeen v. Harmon Grain Products, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1980
- Blake v. Springfield Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1978
- Lugo v. LJN Toys, Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.