Legal Opinion

Harris v. Brady

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 11, 1928No. 18100PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TEEHEE, C.

This is the second appeal in this cause. The facts in the case are well stated in Strawn v. Brady, 84 Okla. 66, 202 Pac. 505, and need not here again be restated except as may be necessary in the course of our consideration of the questions involved.

In the former appeal, plaintiff in error here was a co-plaintiff in error with Strawn, and A. C. Brady was defendant in error, as in the cause in hand. Appellate disposal of that case eliminated Strawn as a party in the subsequent proceedings, wherein the status of the present parties was that of plaintiff and defendant, respectively,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Roberts v. CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 1858
  2. Supervisors v. KennicottSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co. v. AustinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  4. Parker v. RileySupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  5. Barnes v. KeysSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Carpenter v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. White v. McVeySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  3. Blackwell Oil & Gas Co. v. Mid-Continent Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  4. Santa Rita Oil & Gas Co. v. State Board of EqualizationMontana Supreme Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API