Pepper v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office
Colorado Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtLoeb, J.
The sole issue in this appeal is whether § 8-40-202(l)(a)(I)(A), C.R.S.2005, violates equal protection guarantees because it excludes, at the option of the governmental body, members of volunteer police departments from the definition of an “employee” for purposes of workers’ compensation coverage. We conclude that the statute is unconstitutional. Accordingly, we set aside the order of the Industrial Claim Appeals Office (Panel) concluding that Booth Pepper (claimant) was not an employee of the City of Florence (City), and we remand for further consideration of his workers’ compensation claim.
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Duran v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
- Industrial Claim Appeals Office v. RomeroSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
- Christie v. Coors Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1997
- Culver v. Ace ElectricSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
- Whiteside v. SmithSupreme Court of Colorado · 2003
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- 85 Sanchez v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 2017
- Zerba v. Dillon CompaniesColorado Court of Appeals · 2012
- United Airlines v. Industrial Claim Appeals officeColorado Court of Appeals · 2013
- Kadingo v. JohnsonDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2017
- Kilpatrick v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 2015
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.