Legal Opinion

Saltonstall v. Saltonstall

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 20, 1928No. 144PublishedCited by 222 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stone

Plaintiffs in error are beneficiaries of a trust created by deed of Peter C. Brooks. After the death of the settlor the trustees, who, with certain Massachusetts tax officials, are defendants in error, filed in the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts a petition for instructions which joined the beneficiaries of the trust and the officials as respondents, and asked a determination that the Massachusetts statutes taxing inheritances did not affect the property passing to the beneficiaries under the trust, or, if applicable, were “ unconstitutional.” The beneficiaries joined in the prayer of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. New York Trust Co. v. EisnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. Nichols v. CoolidgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  3. Bullen v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  4. Stebbins v. RileySupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  5. Keeney v. Comptroller of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1912

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by222 opinions

  1. Swain v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Corliss v. BowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  3. Estate of Sanford v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  4. Reinecke v. Northern Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1929
  5. Chase National Bank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929

217 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API