Legal Opinion

Yellow Cab Co. v. Industrial Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 7, 1933PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFritz, J.

The only question is whether Hatfield, who was regularly employed by the plaintiff, Yellow Cab Company, from 6 p.m. to S :30 a.m. to attend to its office telephone switch board, and also to load and start taxicabs at the railroad station upon the arrival of certain trains, is entitled to compensation while ill with pneumonia, which he claims he contracted as the result of exposure on February 6, 1931, while engaged in outdoor work at a time when the temperature ranged from 24° to 29° Fahrenheit above zero, and there was a moderate snowfall. Hatfield felt well when he reported for work at 5…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Vennen v. New Dells Lumber Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Bystrom Bros. v. JacobsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Newman v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Scott & Howe Lumber Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Ellingson Lumber Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1918

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Harris v. Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  2. Recht-Goldin-Siegal Construction, Inc. v. Department of RevenueWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Koehring Company, a Corporation v. American Automobile Insurance Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1965
  4. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Telemark Co. v. Department of TaxationWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API