Legal Opinion

Ballman v. Brinker

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 5, 1941No. Nos. 32,954, 32,955PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hilton, Justice.

While driving her husband’s car across an intersection in the city of St. Peter, plaintiff Frances Ballman was struck by a truck belonging to defendant and driven by Roy Lipscy. After verdict, the trial judge ordered judgment notwithstanding upon the ground that there was no evidence to justify the jury in finding that Lipscy was driving the truck at the time of the accident with defendant’s consent, express or implied, so as to charge him under the Minnesota safety responsibility act. Mason St. 1940 Supp. § 2720-104. Upon this appeal from the judgment we need only consider…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. St. Andrassy v. MooneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
  2. Heavilin v. WendellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1932
  3. Kerns v. LewisMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Ewer v. CoppeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  5. Owen v. GruntzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. First National Bank of Mankato v. WilsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  2. Eicher v. Universal UnderwritersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  3. Foster v. BockSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  4. Kisch v. SkowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  5. Truman v. United Products CorporationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API