Legal Opinion

State v. Lewark

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 10, 1920No. 22,488PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Montgomery district court; Joseph W. Holdren, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Mason, J.:

Russ Lewark was convicted of knowingly receiving a stolen Ford automobile, and appeals.

1. The section defining the offense (Gen. Stat. 1915, § 3465) covers the receiving of embezzled goods, and refers to the four preceding sections relating to embezzlement. The suggestion is made that it is intended to reach only cases where the original offense was perpetrated by one acting in a fiduciary capacity. We do not regard the statute as open to that interpretation. The information is also criticised because it.does not allege where the original…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. Edwin FloresCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  2. State v. EmorySupreme Court of Kansas · 1924
  3. State v. SavanOregon Supreme Court · 1934
  4. State v. LogueSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924
  5. State v. MinnickSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API