Legal Opinion

Skinner v. Pacak

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided January 13, 1972No. 8573Published

1Opinion of the Court

WoRley, Chief Judge.

Skinner and Scott (hereafter Skinner) appeal from the decision of the Board of Patent Interferences awarding priority of a single count in interference No. 95,750 to Pacak. The count originated as claim 9 in Skinner patent No. 3,225,425 1 and was copied in Pacak application serial No. 538,853.2 That application was held entitled, through an intervening application, to the benefit of the November 23, 1959, filing date of application serial No. 854,957, which matured into Pacak patent No. 3,087,531, dated April 30, 1963.

No priority testimony was taken, the sole issue being…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mardis v. HinesDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1919
  2. Deibel v. Heise & SchumacherCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
  3. Martin v. FriendlyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1932
  4. Loy W. Sockman and Elliott W. Brady v. Robert C. Switzer and Richard A. WardCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967
  5. Application of Julian Robert Anthony BealeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API