Legal Opinion

Charles v. United States

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 30, 2022No. Civil Action No. 2021-1983Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA NATHAN M. F. CHARLES, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 21-1983 (BAH) v. Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff, Nathan M. F. Charles, Esq., proceeding pro se, filed this lawsuit under the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”), 5 U.S.C. § 552, and the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552a, to compel the production of records maintained by the U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”) in connection with plaintiff’s previous employment in DOJ’s National Security Division (“NSD”). Compl. ¶¶ 1–2, ECF No. 1. 1…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Jerome Stevens Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Food & Drug AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API