Legal Opinion

Lehigh Valley R. v. Russia

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided August 8, 1927No. Nos. 318, 319PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MANTON, Circuit Judge.

As a result of the fire referred to in action No. 1 between those parties, a decision in which is rendered to-day (21 F.[2d] 398), a warehouse in which aluminum, property of the defendant in error was stored, was destroyed. The jury, in answer to a special question, found the fire to have been caused by the sole proximate negligence of the plaintiff in error. On this writ the plaintiff in error has assigned 362 errors. We will not consider them all, but only briefly such as require discussion.

The questions of the jurisdiction of the court and the right of the defendant…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Herencia v. GuzmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Humes v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  3. Lehigh Valley R. v. Allied Machinery Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
  4. Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. Lehigh Valley R.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1921

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lutz Industries, Inc. v. Dixie Home StoresSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  2. Harrison v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1930
  3. Westchester Fire Ins. v. Buffalo Housewrecking & Salvage Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API