Legal Opinion

State v. Armstrong

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided April 4, 1989No. 1 CA-CR 88-347PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FIDEL, Judge.

The state appeals from the trial court’s order dismissing two felony drunk driving charges against Robert Lee Armstrong pursuant to Hinson v. Coulter, 150 Ariz. 306, 723 P.2d 655 (1986). The trial court declined to exclude from its calculation of elapsed time the delay that resulted from the inability of the state to serve defendant with the summons. The state argues that this time should have been excluded under Rule 8.4(a), 17 A.R.S. Arizona Rules of Criminal Procedure, because the state’s service effort met the standard of due diligence. We affirm the trial court…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hinson v. CoulterArizona Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Duron v. FleischmanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1988
  3. State v. TarkingtonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1988
  4. State v. DoolittleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
  5. State v. SnowCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1988

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. McDonnough v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1997
  2. State v. AcinelliCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
  3. Snow v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
  4. Humble v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API