State v. Armstrong
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FIDEL, Judge.
The state appeals from the trial court’s order dismissing two felony drunk driving charges against Robert Lee Armstrong pursuant to Hinson v. Coulter, 150 Ariz. 306, 723 P.2d 655 (1986). The trial court declined to exclude from its calculation of elapsed time the delay that resulted from the inability of the state to serve defendant with the summons. The state argues that this time should have been excluded under Rule 8.4(a), 17 A.R.S. Arizona Rules of Criminal Procedure, because the state’s service effort met the standard of due diligence. We affirm the trial court…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hinson v. CoulterArizona Supreme Court · 1986
- Duron v. FleischmanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1988
- State v. TarkingtonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1988
- State v. DoolittleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
- State v. SnowCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1988
3Cited by4 opinions
- McDonnough v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1997
- State v. AcinelliCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
- Snow v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
- Humble v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993