Legal Opinion

State v. Tarkington

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided January 19, 1988No. 1 CA-CR 11433PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KLEINSCHMIDT, Judge.

The state appeals the trial court’s order dismissing a driving while intoxicated prosecution based on a violation of Rule 8, Arizona Rules of Criminal Procedure, and Hinson v. Coulter, 150 Ariz. 306, 723 P.2d 655 (1986). The trial court’s dismissal is based upon its interpretation of Rule 8.4(a), Arizona Rules of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter “Rule 8”), that unless a defendant’s absence or inability to be arrested is willful or intentional, no time is excluded in finding a Rule 8 violation. We reverse.

CHRONOLOGY

Appellee Johnie Page Tarkington was indicted by the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Berger v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Hinson v. CoulterArizona Supreme Court · 1986
  3. State v. JohnsonArizona Supreme Court · 1976
  4. State v. KnappCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
  5. State v. GroundsArizona Supreme Court · 1981

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Snow v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
  2. Humble v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
  3. State v. ArmstrongCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
  4. State v. GrabbeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API