State v. Doolittle
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CONTRERAS, Judge.
This is an appeal from the trial court’s order granting appellee’s motion to dismiss an indictment and suppress grand jury testimony. The issues presented on appeal are:
1. Did the trial court err as a matter of law in determining that appellee was “a person under investigation” when she appeared and testified before the state grand jury on July 29, 1985?
2. Did the trial court err as a matter of law in suppressing the transcript of appellee’s perjured testimony and dismissing the indictment?
We conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in determining…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Oregon v. HassSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. WongSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. Patrick J. ScullyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State of Arizona v. PowersCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
- State v. IbanezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
- State v. ArmstrongCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989