Legal Opinion
Henman v. State
Idaho Court of Appeals
Decided August 13, 1998No. 23042Published
1Opinion of the Court
966 P.2d 49 (1998)
132 Idaho 49
Ronald Keith HENMAN, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
STATE of Idaho, Respondent.
No. 23042.
Court of Appeals of Idaho.
August 13, 1998.
Review Denied October 29, 1998.
Ellsworth, Kallas, P.L.L.C., Boise, for appellant. Joseph L. Ellsworth argued.
Hon. Alan G. Lance, Attorney General; Michaelina B. Murphy, Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent. Michaelina B. Murphy argued.
PERRY, Judge.
Ronald Keith Henman appeals from the district court's order summarily dismissing his application for post-conviction relief. On appeal, Henman asserts that he was placed in jeopardy when…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. BroceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- State v. RaudebaughIdaho Supreme Court · 1993
- Dunlap v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1995
- Fischer v. FischerIdaho Supreme Court · 1968
- State v. GoodwinIdaho Court of Appeals · 1998
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.