Legal Opinion

State v. Goodwin

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided April 22, 1998No. 23398, 23405 and 23438PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHWARTZMAN, Judge.

Mark Goodwin, David Goodwin and Randall Goodwin appeal from judgments of conviction entered following their conditional pleas of guilty to possession of a controlled substance, Idaho Code § 37-2732(c)(l). The sole issue raised on appeal by the Goodwins challenges the district court’s denial of their motions to suppress. We affirm.

I

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Mark L. Goodwin, David Goodwin and Randall Goodwin were all residing at the home of Mark Goodwin. Law enforcement authorities obtained a warrant authorizing the search of Mark Goodwin’s house. During the search the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. California v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. State v. ZichkoIdaho Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. GuzmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1992
  4. State v. ThompsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Mead v. ArnellIdaho Supreme Court · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. State v. GrazianIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Cook v. State, Department of TransportationIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State v. David Leroy LeeIdaho Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Henman v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. Grove v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 2017

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API