Legal Opinion
United States v. Thomas Donald Chestang, A/K/A Donnie, and Roy H. Chestang
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided July 13, 1988No. 87-7304PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CLARK, Circuit Judge:
After a jury trial, Roy and Thomas Donald Chestang were convicted of conspiring to possess cocaine with intent to distribute and conspiring to distribute cocaine. See 18 U.S.C.A. § 2; 21 U.S.C.A. § 846 (West 1988). The Chestangs appeal their convictions, contending that the district court erred in (1) allowing the statements of their coconspirators to be admitted into evidence under Fed.R.Evid. 801(d)(2)(E), (2) allowing the endorsements on certain money orders and cashier’s checks to be admitted into evidence under Fed.R.Evid. 902(9), (3) denying their motions for…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Bourjaily v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Delaware v. FenstererSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- City of Tuscaloosa v. Harcros Chemicals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
- United States v. HillCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Dynalectric Company Paxson Electric Company G.W. Walther Ewalt Wesley C. Paxson, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Kishor Joshi, Jitendra Panchal, Jagadish PanchalCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Mobile Materials, Inc. And Gerald O. PhilpotCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.