Legal Opinion
United States v. Mobile Materials, Inc. And Gerald O. Philpot
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided July 28, 1989No. 86-1756PublishedCited by 77 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING
2Per curiam
In our last disposition of this case, we declined to consider various points raised by appellants because we lacked relevant portions of the trial transcript. United States v. Mobile Materials, Inc. (Mobile Materials II), 871 F.2d 902, 906 n. 1, 918 (10th Cir.1989). This case illustrates the need for appellate counsel to monitor carefully the preparation, designation and transmission of the record on appeal. Three problems occurred here.
First, although a substantial portion of the trial transcript was ordered and filed 1 at the district court, some portions of the…
3Cases cited43 opinions
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- United States v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Allen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Bourjaily v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by77 opinions
- Tal v. HoganCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- Mitchell v. MaynardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- Bloate v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- United States v. Norman D. Wright, United States of America v. George W. Kirby, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. HardwellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.