Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Parbhu

Criminal Court of the City of New York

Decided April 17, 2002PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Matthew F. Cooper, J.

The defendant is charged with the crimes of public lewdness, in violation of Penal Law § 245.00, sexual abuse in the third degree, in violation of Penal Law § 130.55, and forcible touch*474ing, in violation of Penal Law § 130.52 (1) and (2).1 The defendant moves to dismiss the two counts of forcible touching on the grounds of facial insufficiency. The defendant also moves for various other relief.

Facial Sufficiency

Forcible touching became a crime in New York on February 1, 2001. The Legislature added the offense, a class A misdemeanor, as part of the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Majewski v. Broadalbin-Perth Central School DistrictNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. People v. AlejandroNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. People v. ThompsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. Tompkins v. . HunterNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  5. People v. ColemanNew York Court of Appeals · 1977

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. SotoCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2002
  2. People v. SerranoNassau County District Court · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API