Legal Opinion
People v. Soto
Criminal Court of the City of New York
Decided July 8, 2002PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Patricia Nuñez, J.
The defendant is charged with sexual abuse in the third *162degree, in violation of Penal Law § 130.55, and two counts of forcible touching, in violation of Penal Law § 130.52 (1) and (2). The defendant moves for an order dismissing the charge of forcible touching on the grounds of facial insufficiency and for various other relief.
A misdemeanor information is sufficient on its face if it contains nonhearsay factual allegations which, if true, establish every element of the offense and provide reasonable cause to believe the defendant committed the offense…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- People v. AlejandroNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. DumasNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- People v. CaseNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- People v. HallNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- People Ex Rel. Onondaga County Savings Bank v. ButlerNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. Rosas-PulidoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
- People v. SerranoNassau County District Court · 2004
- People v. TaylorNassau County District Court · 2009