Legal Opinion

R. R. v. . Way

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 22, 1916PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The case was before this Court at Spring Term, 1915, and is reported in 169 N.C. at p. 1. We then granted a new trial. At the last trial the jury returned the following verdict:

1. Are Way Bros. the owners, in the actual occupation, and entitled to the possession of Lot No. 8 in said Block No. 7 in the plan of Morehead City? Answer: "Yes; by color of title more than seven years."

2. Was Lot No. 8 in said Block No. 7 filled up above high-water mark and thus reclaimed by Way Bros. and those under whom they claim prior to the filling in of the other lots, including 6 and 7, by the Government…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bond v. . WoolSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  2. Shepard's Point Land Co. v. Atlantic HotelSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  3. Hahn v. Baker Lodge, No. 47Oregon Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Home Real Estate Loan & Insurance v. ShaffnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  5. Holley v. Smith.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1902

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Gwathmey v. STATE THROUGH DEPT. OF ENVIR.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1995
  2. Trustees of Howard College v. McNabbSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
  3. Capune v. RobbinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  4. Home Real Estate Loan & Insurance v. ShaffnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  5. McGiffin v. City of GatlinburgTennessee Supreme Court · 1953

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API