Capune v. Robbins
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.
We consider first whether defendant had a legal right to forbid and prohibit plaintiff from passing under the pier on his paddleboard.
The Federal Statute, 33 U.S.C.A. § 403, relating to the obstruction of navigable waters, required that defendant’s predecessor, before constructing a pier, obtain permission to do so from the U. S. Corps of Engineers. Otherwise, the issuance of the permit did not enlarge or impair defendant’s littoral rights.
Subject to the authority and rights of the United States respecting navigation, flood control and production of power, Congress, by enactment of the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Trustees of the Freeholders & Commonalty of Brookhaven v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
- Weems Steamboat Co. of Baltimore v. People's Steamboat Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Bond v. . WoolSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
- Barnes v. . Midland R.R. Terminal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1908
- Shepard's Point Land Co. v. Atlantic HotelSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Great Cove Boat Club v. Bureau of Public LandsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
- Carolina Beach Fishing Pier, Inc. v. Town of Carolina BeachSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- Branch Banking & Trust Company v. GillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- Weeks v. North Carolina Department of Natural Resources & Community DevelopmentCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
- Newcomb v. County of CarteretCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.