Legal Opinion

Home Real Estate Loan & Insurance v. Shaffner

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 22, 1938PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBaeNHill, J.

The common law rule that streams are navigable only as far as tidewater extends developed from the fact that England does not have to any great extent nontidal waters which are navigable. This common law rule has been discarded in this country. Here, the term “navigable waters” has reference to commerce of a substantial and permanent character to be, or which may be, conducted thereon. Leovy v. United States, 177 U. S., 621, 44 L. Ed., 914. By “navigable waters” are meant such as are navigable in fact and which by themselves or their connection with other waters, form a continuous channel for…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Kansas v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. Knight v. United States Land Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. Leovy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  4. Miller v. Mayor of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  5. Hoboken v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1888

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Gwathmey v. STATE THROUGH DEPT. OF ENVIR.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1995
  2. Carolina Beach Fishing Pier, Inc. v. Town of Carolina BeachSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  3. State Ex Rel. Rhodes v. SimpsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  4. Kelly v. . KingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  5. R. R. v. . WaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API