Legal Opinion

Baldwin v. Higgins

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided December 5, 1938No. 122PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

This action seeks recovery of overpayment of income tax for the year 1932. By a compromise, a balance of tax díte was agreed upon and some payments made. A *406balance remaining unpaid, the taxpayer repudiated the agreement and sued to recover that which he had paid. The c'ase was tried without a jury. There are no findings of fact presented in this record. No rulings in the progress of the trial were excepted to at the time nor are they duly presented by the bill of exceptions. No substantial question on the pleadings is presented. The judgment will therefore be affirmed. Harvey Co. v. Malley,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Arthur C. Harvey Co. v. MalleySupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Eastman Kodak Co. v. GraySupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Armstrong v. Metropolitan Life Ins.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1936

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Flora v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Flora v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API